@article{oai:ipu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000543,
 author = {早田, 剛 and 古山, 喜一 and 前川, 真姫 and 宮川, 健 and 飯出, 一秀 and 安田, 従生 and 三浦, 隆 and HAYATA, Gou and FURUYAMA, Yoshiichi and MAEKAWA, Maki and MIYAKAWA, Takeshi and IIDE, Kazuhide and YASUDA, Nobuo and MIURA, Takashi},
 journal = {環太平洋大学研究紀要, Bulletin of International Pacific University},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {[Aims] The purpose of this study was to clarify the relations between locomotive　syndrome risk test and the fitness test. [method] Ninety five persons (mean age =33.4±15.3 years, range = 16-74 years) participated in this study. The following physical performance measures were examined: the locomotive risk test [the stand-up test and the 2-step test] and fitness test [grip, timed up and go test, sit-ups, sit-and-Reach, single-leg stance with eyes open or close, Foot-gripping, Side Steps, stepping test, knee extensor muscle strength in the sitting position, knee extensor muscle strength in the long sitting position, and hip adduction and adductor muscular strength]. [result] In the stand-up test, eight people were locomotive syndrome risk degree 1 (not clear 40㎝ with a single leg), no people were degree 2 (not clear 20㎝ with both legs). In 2-steps test, six people were locomotive syndrome risk degree 2 (less than 1.1), no people were degree 2 (less than 1.1). The standup test was correlation with all fitness tests. 2-step test was not correlation with sit-and-reach, singleleg stance with eyes open or close and knee extensor muscle strength in the long sitting position. [conclusion] It was considered that the training around the hip joint was effective because stand-up test was high coefficient of correlation in the sit-ups and stepping test. It was suggested training was more effective in the standing position than in the long sitting position. It helped examine a training method for the locomotive syndrome prevention.},
 pages = {191--196},
 title = {ロコモ度テストと体力テストの関係},
 volume = {11},
 year = {2017}
}